Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the Public Policy Exception

1.0 Introduction to the book
1.1 An overview of the international regime on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards
1.2 Identifying the difficulties encountered in implementing this regime

2.0 The exceptions to the Enforcement of the Foreign Arbitral Awards within the New York Convention - jurisprudence from State Practice
2.1 Article V(1)(a)
2.2 Article V(1)(b)
2.3 Article V(1)(c)
2.4 Article V(1)(d)
2.5 Article V(1)(e)
2.6 Article V(2)(a) &(b)
3.0 UNCITRAL Model Law
3.1 - mapping the work of Working Group II
3.2 - UNCITRAL ML on recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards
3.3 - Article 34 - set aside of arbitral awards
3.4 - Article 36 - refusal of recognition or enforcement of foreign arbitral awards
4.0 The Public Policy Exception to Enforcement - the origins in private law
4.1 - articulation of public policy within private international law
4.2 - public policy in international commercial arbitration
4.3 the manifestation and diversity of public policy within international commercial arbitration
4.4 - the guidance under the international instruments related to international arbitration
4.5 - The New York Convention on Public Policy
4.6 - The UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Policy

5.0 - State practice on the delimitation and interpretation - the maximalist and minimalist approaches
5.1 - instances of delimitation of Public Policy exception through statutory provisions
5.2 - judicial interpretations on the scope of the public policy exception

6.0 - Public policy - need to rein the unruly horse
6.1 - time for a uniform approach to public policy
6.2 - a possible content for public policy - fundamental standards of the international community and international conventions
7.0 - Conclusion